Tag Archives: Customer
Rebuilding Cost Estimator Tools for Insurers: The Next Generation of Precision and Protection In the dynamic landscape of property insurance, accuracy is not just a goal—it’s a fundamental pillar of trust, solvency, and customer satisfaction
At the heart of this accuracy lies the rebuilding cost estimate (RCE), a critical calculation that determines the sum insured for a property. For decades, insurers have relied on estimator tools to generate these figures, but evolving risks, construction complexities, and technological advancements are driving a necessary evolution. The industry is now poised for a significant leap forward in rebuilding cost estimator tools, moving from static calculators to dynamic, intelligent systems.
The High Stakes of Estimation
An inaccurate RCE carries profound consequences for all parties. Underinsurance leaves policyholders devastatingly exposed, potentially unable to fully rebuild after a loss. For insurers, overinsurance leads to inflated premiums, customer dissatisfaction, and moral hazard, while systemic underestimation threatens portfolio resilience and solvency in the wake of a widespread catastrophe. Traditional tools, often based on broad regional averages, square footage multipliers, and infrequently updated cost databases, struggle to account for the unique variables of each risk.
The Limitations of Legacy Systems
Conventional estimator tools frequently face challenges:
* Data Silos and Latency: Relying on outdated cost manuals or annual updates fails to capture real-time fluctuations in labor and material costs, especially volatile in post-disaster or inflationary environments.
* Lack of Granularity: They often miss property-specific details: unique architectural features, high-end finishes, local building code upgrades (like hurricane straps or seismic retrofits), and site-specific challenges (remote access, slope).
* The Human Factor: Heavy reliance on adjuster or agent input introduces variability and potential for error in the description of the property.
* Inability to Model Future Costs: Most tools estimate today’s cost to rebuild, not the potential cost at an unknown future claim date, failing to adequately address inflation guard needs.
Blueprint for the Next Generation:
Key Features of Modern Tools
The next generation of rebuilding cost estimator tools is being built on a foundation of data integration, automation, and predictive intelligence. Here are the core components defining this evolution:
1. Hyper-Granular Data Integration
Modern tools will pull from a vast array of live data feeds:
* Real-Time Construction Cost Databases: Integrating with platforms that track daily prices for lumber, steel, roofing, and skilled labor rates by ZIP code.
* Property Intelligence Platforms: Automatically pulling in detailed attributes from satellite imagery, aerial photography, and public records—footprint, roof shape, number of stories, pool, outbuildings.
* Local Building Code Repositories: Factoring in mandatory code upgrades specific to the jurisdiction, which can significantly impact rebuilding costs.
2. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
AI transforms the estimator from a calculator to a predictive model:
* Image Recognition: Analyzing submitted or sourced photos to identify construction quality, finishes, and special features (e.g., custom cabinetry, hardwood floors).
* Pattern Learning: Continuously improving accuracy by comparing initial estimates to actual claim settlement data, learning from discrepancies.
* Risk-Specific Modeling: Adjusting estimates for location-based risks, such as factoring in higher material waste for a steeply sloped lot or the premium for fire-resistant materials in a wildfire zone.
3. Geospatial and Catastrophe Modeling Integration
Forward-looking tools will be embedded with catastrophe model insights:
* Post-Catastrophe Demand Surge: Automatically applying probabilistic demand surge multipliers after events like hurricanes or wildfires, which can spike local labor and material costs by 50% or more.
* Component-Level Vulnerability: Estimating not just the cost to rebuild, but the likely cost to repair specific, vulnerable components based on wind, hail, or seismic risk scores.
4. Enhanced User Experience and Transparency
For agents, underwriters, and policyholders, the tool must educate as it calculates:
* Interactive, Line-Item Estimates: Moving beyond a single figure to a transparent breakdown (foundation, framing, roofing, interior finishes), building trust and understanding.
* Scenario Modeling: Allowing users to adjust assumptions (e.g., “what if we account for green building standards?”) to see the impact on the estimate.
* Clear Documentation: Automatically generating a report that justifies the estimate with sourced data, crucial for audits and customer conversations.
The Strategic Benefits for Insurers
Investing in advanced RCE tools delivers a compelling return:
* Underwriting Precision: Sharper risk selection and pricing, leading to a healthier, more profitable portfolio.
* Reduced Underinsurance Gap: Protecting brand reputation and ensuring policyholders have adequate coverage, which is a key measure of fair customer outcomes.
* Operational Efficiency: Automating data collection and initial estimation frees up skilled underwriters and adjusters for complex risk assessment and customer service.
* Enhanced Claims Preparedness: Starting with a robust, defensible estimate streamlines the claims process and reduces settlement disputes.
* Data-Driven Product Development: The rich data generated can inform new insurance products and coverage options tailored to emerging risks and customer segments.
The Road Ahead
The future of rebuilding cost estimation is not a standalone tool, but a seamlessly integrated “estimation engine” within the insurer’s ecosystem—connected to underwriting platforms, policy administration systems, and claims management software. It will function in real-time, be self-learning, and provide a living, adjustable view of a property’s insurance-to-value.
For insurers, the mandate is clear. Transitioning to these sophisticated estimator tools is no longer a technological luxury but a strategic imperative. It is a direct investment in underwriting integrity, customer trust, and financial resilience. By rebuilding the estimator, insurers are fundamentally rebuilding the foundation of property risk protection itself.
The 5 W’s of World Class Customer Service Training
The 5 W’s of World Class Customer Service Training
The preamble to the United States Constitution begins, ‘we, the people.’ I feel strongly that we, the people, are what make the difference in life, both personally and professionally.
The interaction anyone has at any level with your employees, including you, gives a customer– whether current, potential, internal or external–an opportunity to make a judgment about you, your company, all companies like yours. I’m not just talking about call centers here. All technical support or help desk personnel are included as well. As a matter of fact, anyone who is in the customer service business period.
With continued focus on customer satisfaction, customer retention, and lifetime value of the customer, it is no surprise that contact center operations continue to increase in importance as the primary hub of a customer’s experience. For the customer, the person on the other end of the phone is the company. The contact center is still the most common way that customers get in touch with businesses. In fact, Gartner reports 92% of all contact is through the center. And it’s been reported that 70% to 90% of what happens with customers is driven by human nature, having nothing to do with technology. State of the art technology is a necessity today, but it is meant to enable human endeavors, not to disable them.
I often talk about taking customer service and ‘kicking it up a notch.’ In the food industry, the word ‘lagniappe’ is often used. Its definition is “a small present given to a customer with a purchase. For example, when you go to the bakery and buy a dozen donuts or bagels, you oftentimes get a ‘free’ one or a baker’s dozen. That’s what customer service should be about–giving the customer more than they expected! Let’s bring lagniappe into the contact center industry.
If we’re going to speak about world class customer service, let’s have a working definition it so we’re all on the same page. Customer service is those activities provided by a company’s employees that enhance the ability of a customer to realize the full potential value of a product or service before and after the sale is made, thereby leading to satisfaction and repurchase.
Let’s look at the first W which is Why?
The state of customer service today is not good, be it over the phone or self service. Because 92% of people feel their call experience is important in shaping the image of a company, this reinforces the importance of centers in branding the image of their companies.
In a Mobius Management Systems Survey, here’s what happened because of poor customer service:
60% cancelled accounts with banks
36% changed insurance providers
40% changed telephone companies
35% changed credit card providers
375 changed Internet service providers
Are you one of these statistics? I certainly am.
In a study done by Purdue University and BenchmarkPortal.com, in answer to (1) how did agents satisfy your needs and handle the call, and (2) based on any negative experience, would you stop using this company in the future? the findings reveal a strong correlation between the participant’s age and the tendency to stop using the company after a bad experience.
What does this mean? Younger participants were less tolerant and more likely to move to the competition. People over 65 were found to be more demanding than those in middle age.
What can you do? Give younger callers a ‘wow’ experience–maintain their loyalty. People over 36 probably have more of an ‘emotional bank account’ with the company they are dealing with–maybe had some good experience and therefore are more willing to ‘forgive.’
In a recent study (CRM Magazine/PeopleSoft Web Seminar on How Usability Helps to Drive a Profitable Contact Center), the number of applications required for agents to access customer inquiries were:
3.7% just 1
81.5% 2 – 5
7.4% 5 – 10
7.4% more than 10
As you can see, the majority of applications are 2 – 5. The goal, of course, is to link every point of contact to one central location for a customer-centric, synchronized approach satisfying customer experiences with every interaction.
Strategies for success for world class service should include:
Respond promptly
Handle requests through the customers’ choice of medium
Be brief and clear
Reduce back and forth communications (especially in writing, i.e., email, kick it up to a phone call if it goes beyond two)
Personalized service
Delight the customer
What do we mean by delighting the customer?
Inform and educate them
Establish your expertise and professionalism
Offer options
Diffuse upset, anger, when and if necessary
Escalate, if required
Take Ownership of the call
Remember we’re still on the first W – the Why. Today’s pressures on agents are different than in the past. They are asked to handle more customer, more volume, more complex and/or complicated calls. After all if we could handle our issues with self service, we probably would not call. But if we tried self service and it didn’t work, now we’re upset and it’s an escalated call from the get go.
They’re asked to provide more information, do it faster and be available and accessible. But they are to lower costs, generate revenue, incorporate new technologies, ensure closure and commitment, deliver ‘great’ service and when? Yesterday, of course.
As a matter of fact the CDC (Center for Disease Control) has said that the causes of death for people under 65 are:
21% – environment – war, accidents, crimes
9% – health care system – doctors, hospitals, medications
17% – human biology – not because of lifestyle
53% – because of the way people choose to live their lives!!!
This is the good news and the bad news. It’s bad news because it’s more than half. However, the good news is that this is something we can do something about, it’s about choice.
The #2 W is Who should be trained?
We suggest front line agents/representatives, supervisors, team lads, managers, assistant managers, internal customers and other departments – anyone who is a touch point so that they can learn to speak the same language, and more importantly, not be in an adversarial position, but rather, together they are serving the external customer or end user.
The #3 W is Where should the training take place? Offsite vs onsite, and there are advantages and disadvantages for both.
Certainly it is most cost effective to have training on site. However, distractions are rampant as is the participant’s availability to a person or problem.
Offsite is more costly. However, there are no distractions and the participants are unavailable to other departments, their managers, or any issues. I believe there is psychic value in taking people away from their work stations and off site to acknowledge the touch jobs they have.
The #4 W is What should be included in any training? We believe the following modules provide a robust, powerful, and succinct training curriculum:
Quality Customer Service Rapport Building
Customer Expectations
Perception Shifting Conflict Resolution
Language Skills
Anger Management E-Mail Protocol
Stress Reduction Empathetic Responsiveness
Change Management
Communication/Listening Skills Interaction/Role Play
Service with a Smile
Further suggested is university certification to up the ante. The more professionally you treat your employees, the more professionally they will treat your customers.
The #5 W is When. We say for new hires, monthly, ongoingly, consistently, whenever change occurs, when stressors increase, and as needed.
We further suggest that each employee get a minimum of 24 hours per year of ongoing training, spread out over time for the most absorption. We divide our trainings into two four hour sessions per day and deliver 6 days per employee. Therefore, 30 people can participate in the training per day. If there has been no ongoing training, we do four days once a month for four months and then a session three months later, and then another three months later. In this manner, training is customized, in real time, and can address whatever challenges are presented when they occur.
